Sweet Publishing / FreeBibleimages.org.
Day 100! Can you believe it? Just three more weeks and will be one-third of the way through the Bible.
Welcome to Livin’ Light’s Bible-In-A-Year challenge of discovering God’s love for us and His purpose for our lives. Here is the format for this great adventure: The daily reading assignment is posted at 5 a.m. After each day’s reading, Leigh An Coplin, the blog host, shares observations and poses questions about difficult passages to Rob Fields, who studied Christian Education at Asbury Seminary and currently teaches Biology in the Orlando area. To start from the beginning, click on 365 Bible Readings and scroll down to Day 1. The reading schedule is taken from The One Year Chronological Bible NLT.
Today’s Reading
— 1 Samuel 4:12-8:22
(1070 BC) Click here for a timeline of the entire Bible.
Questions & Observations
Q. (1 Samuel 4): Just as a scene setter, the Israelites were warring with the Philistines who were in the land of Canaan, which God had given to the Israelites. When the Israelites were taking over the land conquering cities in the time of Joshua, some of the tribes were not destroyed. This is because the Israelites were not fully acknowledging God. And, as you said in earlier readings, this would come back to plague the Israelites. Since then, the Philistines had grown in strength and worshipped idols and the Israelites had weakened because of straying from God. The Philistines had enslaved the Israelites (Hebrews) and the Israelites were revolting. Is this accurate?
A. I don’t think the Israelites were actively being enslaved, but rather the Philistines were taxing them and controlling certain areas of Canaan, and that is what the people were revolting against. Other then that, I think you’ve told it correctly.
Q. (5:1-12): I remember when the Tabernacle was set up that it was so sacred that only certain ones who had become ceremonially clean could view it. And, several died trying. Here the Philistines have it. Has it lost some of its sacredness with the weakening of the Israelites? How come the Philistines were not struck down as they approached it, let alone touched it? In the subsequent verses, we learn that they were plagued. This just seems a weaker curse for mistreating the Ark than in Moses’ time.
A. The curse in some ways represents a form of God’s mercy: the Philistines were not aware of the Israelite requirements to not approach the Ark, so God spared them, but He clearly let them know that He was displeased (the curses are certainly a similar story to the plagues of Egypt). There is no indication that the Philistines touched the Ark, which would result in their death. They carried the Ark on a cart to avoid touching it directly. This was obviously not what God instructed: He wanted the priests to carry it. So, I would say that the “weaker” curse, as you see it, is God having compassion upon a people who don’t know what they are getting themselves into. They certainly learned fast that you don’t mess with the Ark.
Q. (6:1-2): The Philistines obviously should have realized the power of God. I’m just wondering why they didn’t convert to worshipping God. Were they ever invited? Or, was it understood that they all had their own idols? The Philistine priests did a good job of making arrangements for the Ark to be returned. And, they saw what the Ark did to Dagon. So, why don’t they turn to God?
A. Hmm, that’s a good question. I don’t really know. It was probably because they considered this to be “Israel’s god” which they had offended, and not necessarily that Israel’s god was more “powerful,” simply that they had angered Him.
Q. (8:1-3): Samuel’s sons are falling in the footsteps of Eli’s. What’s up with these priests parenting skills?
A. We aren’t told, so I don’t really have anything to base an answer off of. Sorry!
Q. (8:21): Why didn’t God encourage Samuel to keep urging the Israelites that God was their king and that they don’t need to be like their neighbor countries? Is this a “wait and see” question?
A. Again, this is a good question, but I don’t have a great answer. We know from the Law that God had already made provision for a human king (see Deuteronomy 17:14-20, from our reading on Day 76). God was not threatened by the request for a human king — though it appears He was a bit insulted — but He does warn the people that they will regret giving themselves over to a human leader. Boy will they.
For further study
— All about kings and those of today, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/King
— Why did the Israelites want an earthly king when they already had God as their leader? https://www.christianity.com/wiki/bible/why-did-israel-want-an-earthly-king-when-they-had-god.html
Shop: Christian shirts get noticed. Check out these conversation starters: https://livinlight.org/shop/
Tomorrow’s reading: 1 Samuel 9-12
